Hans Jonas’ Restructuring of Kant’s Ethical Categorical Imperative in the Age of Technology
[ send me this paper ]
This is a 5 page paper discussing Jonas’ restructuring of Kant’s categorical imperative in regards to ethically responsible decisions and actions. In the 18th and 19th centuries, philosophers such as Immanual Kant were interested in “the supreme moral principle” which would govern individual action and decision making in society, religion and politics. Kant in his work “Foundations of the Metaphysics of Morals” developed the categorical imperative which stated “Act so that you can will that the maxim of your action be made the principle of universal law”. This reasoning reflected that individuals “ought” to act in relation to their moral duty and not out of self interest for the good of humanity and society. Since the advent of modern global technology however, contemporary philosophers argue that this categorical imperative falls short of preserving humanity. Hans Jonas in particular argues that Kant’s categorical imperative does not reflect the responsibility needed in present actions in order to preserve not only present generations but also future generations. Technology has such a global impact on all of humanity and the environment that decisions made today must have an imperative of responsibility for the future of humanity. Bibliography lists 11 sources.
Filename: TJJonas1.rtf

	< Previous Paper   Next Paper >
Related Research Papers and Reports: Global Issues Globalization and Slavery Guns and Special Interest Lobbies Harvard Case: Export Of Pesticides Healthcare Ethics: Plato's Perspective Hobbes, Aquinas And Plato: The Role Of Morality In Establishing An Obligation To Obey Law

If this paper is not what YOU want,
CLICK HERE
to return to the subject list
-or-
SEARCH FOR YOUR PAPER TOPIC BY KEYWORD:

Rather Just Have Us Write Something NEW?
Something That....
More Closely Matches YOUR Topic?